I had a post a few weeks back concerning CI-128. I spoke about my experience when dealing with women who have had abortions. While abortion is often portrayed as such, it is neither an easy answer, nor a painless answer.
I'd like to speak to a few thing in relationship to CI-128 in particular. (My friends and family in South Dakota may find similar concerns about South Dakota Amendment G.)
- Voting "no" will not end abortion in Montana.
- Voting "yes" will take away a parent's right to be involved in the health care decisions of their children.
- This also opens the door to an increase in child sexual abuse.
- It could also lead to more human trafficking in Montana
- Voting "yes" will introduce vague language into the constitution that will be litigated for many years and will cost taxpayers.
- Voting "yes" will eliminate reasonable protections built into current law to protect women.
- Voting "yes" will open the door for unsavory healthcare professionals to offer services.
- "Healthcare professionals" does not equal Medical Doctors
Listen to the Lawyer's perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment